Starbucks Reserve: Exclusive to 1,600 Stores


Editorial Policy

Published on

[I]t was always irksome that Starbucks talked itself up as being the leading edge of coffee, but there were reasons to begrudgingly accept, or shrug off, the claim. Without Starbucks, it’s hard to see coffee being in the place it is now. Fine. It’s also what successful companies do, especially those traded on the stock market.

Early last month, Starbucks announced it was opening a roastery and tasting room on Capitol Hill in Seattle that would feature its reserve line of coffees. Their press release says, in third person, “This consolidation of small-batch roasting will allow the company to expand their Starbucks Reserve coffee line to 1,500 locations globally, as well as open at least 100 stores designed to highlight these rare coffees exclusively.” Yes, small-batch, consolidation, and 1,500 were used together.

Starbucks_Coffee_Roast (1)
(Photos: Starbucks.)

The announcement, filled with plenty of other Starbucks-sized numbers, included this quote from president Howard Schultz: “the Starbucks Reserve Roastery and tasting room is a multi-sensory experience that will transform the future of specialty coffee.” That sort of puffery is just lame. Victrola Coffee Roasters and Caffe Vita are two local roasteries on Capitol Hill that Schultz is ignoring, and Stumptown’s Seattle roastery is two blocks off Capitol Hill. There’s not enough space here to list all the other café-roasteries within five miles of Starbucks’ so-called transformative space.

This has an analog in the craft beer world. Beginning in the mid-2000s, about the time craft beer began making regular appearances in the mainstream press, a wave of faux-micros appeared, jacking the branding and styles of the small brewers. It was obnoxious to find out you overpaid for a Budweiser product. Mostly, though, it showed how deeply craft beer had cut into the beer market.

A similar dynamic is at play here. If the small chains and single-store roaster-retailers aren’t eating into Starbucks profits, they’re at least boxing out a growing segment of coffee drinkers. Starbucks has been experimenting for years with ways to catch up with the cutting edge of coffee, which is probably impossible for a company its size. They seem to agree, and essentially created a new brand, with minimal connections to its parent, to try to compete.

Schultz’s quote may be annoying, but take heart: there’s something flattering knowing you’re a threat.

Cory Eldridge is Fresh Cup’s editor.

Share This Article

Cory Eldridge

Join 7,000+ coffee pros and get top stories, deals, and other industry goodies in your inbox each week.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Other Articles You May Like

Decaf Coffee, But Make It Specialty

Decaf coffee has come a long way over the last one hundred years, but can it join the third wave?
by Fionn Pooler | February 16, 2024

Welcoming Home Baristas Into Coffee: “It’s On Us, The Professionals”

More and more folks are finding a passion for coffee through swipes and likes, but who is the home barista? How can roasters and cafes welcome them into the larger coffee community?
by Miranda Haney | January 12, 2024

The Prototype of All Desire: How Processing Can Increase—and Improve—Sweetness in Robusta

Sweetness in coffee is often a marker of quality, but it’s often ignored when talking about Robusta. But small changes at the farm level can be the key to finding more sweetness in Robusta.
by Mikey Rinaldo | December 15, 2023

Latte Art and Alternative Milks: The Good, The Bad, and the Tasty

Milk steaming is a hard-earned skill; alternative milks don’t make this task easier. But with a few tips, you can easily toggle from oat to soy to almond.
by Zoe Stanley-Foreman | December 13, 2023