Starbucks, Other Coffee Giants Sued Over Alleged Forced Labor in Brazilian Coffee Supply Chain

by

Editorial Policy

Published on

✉️ This story was featured in this week’s Coffee News Club
👋 Get the Coffee News Club newsletter in your inbox weekly—sign up.

Brazil is the world’s largest coffee producer, and much of that coffee ends up in the United States. Now, Ephrat Livni for the New York Times reports that two advocacy groups have filed a pair of legal challenges, alleging that some of the Brazilian coffee purchased by large U.S. brands is produced using forced labor and human trafficking.

A group called the International Rights Advocates (IRA) filed a federal lawsuit against Starbucks on behalf of eight Brazilian workers, alleging that they were trafficked and forced to work in “slavery-like conditions” on farms within the coffee giant’s supply chain.

The suit seeks to gain class action certification to represent thousands of workers that, IRA claims, have worked under similar conditions on farms affiliated with Cooxupé, Brazil’s largest cooperative and a Starbucks supplier. There are over 300,000 coffee farms in Brazil and more than 18,000 within Cooxupé’s supplier network.

“Starbucks needs to be accountable,” Terry Collingsworth, founder of IRA, told Livni. “There is a massive trafficking and forced labor system in Brazil,” from which Starbucks benefits, Collingsworth said. Starbucks denied the allegations.

Investigators have found similar issues on Starbucks-linked farms in Brazil, Guatemala, and China in recent years. 

In a separate filing, the nonprofit Coffee Watch petitioned the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to block coffee imports from Brazil from brands including Starbucks, Nestlé, Jacob Douwe Egberts, Dunkin, Illy, and McDonald’s. The group wants CBP to invoke Section 307 of the Tariff Act, which prohibits importing products linked to forced labor. 

“Every time consumers pay inflated prices for their daily coffee, they unknowingly support a system that violates the most basic human rights that Americans hold dear,” Etelle Higonnet, founder and director of Coffee Watch, said in a statement. “Companies making billions in profits have had decades to fix this problem but have chosen profit over people.”

Read the full story from the New York Times here.

Share This Article
Avatar photo

Fionn Pooler

Fionn Pooler is a coffee roaster and freelance writer currently based in the Scottish Highlands who has worked in the specialty coffee industry for over a decade. Since 2016 he has written the Pourover, a newsletter and blog that uses interviews and critical analysis to explore coffee’s place in the wider, changing world (and also yell at corporations).

Join 7,000+ coffee pros and get top stories, deals, and other industry goodies in your inbox each week.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Other Articles You May Like

The SCA’s Q Program Takeover Leaves the Coffee Industry Divided

In April, the Specialty Coffee Association announced it would be taking over the Q Grader Program, news that took the coffee industry by surprise. Now, as the dust settles, many remain confused and frustrated—but…
by Fionn Pooler | May 23, 2025

TechnoServe Report Proves Regenerative Agriculture Works, Urges Industry to Invest

Investing in regenerative agriculture could boost smallholder farmer income and coffee exports while reducing carbon emissions, according to a new report released by the nonprofit organization TechnoServe.
by Fionn Pooler | May 21, 2025

In Uganda, Bayaaya Pays a Premium for Cherries from Women Farmers

A Ugandan entrepreneur founded a company that pays a premium for coffee cherries from women farmers.
by Fionn Pooler | May 20, 2025

Coffee News Club: Week of May 19th

At Starbucks, wrong shirt, wrong shoes, no service. Plus, new pricing models from the SCA and a report proves that regenerative agriculture is beneficial to farmers.
by Fionn Pooler | May 19, 2025