To-Go Cups Shed Microplastics. Hot Temperatures Make It Worse.

by

Editorial Policy

Published on

✉️ This story was featured in this week’s Coffee News Club
👋 Get the Coffee News Club newsletter in your inbox weekly—sign up.

Another week, another study showing how to-go coffee cups leach microplastics. 

This is a topic we’ve covered a lot (and rightfully so—it’s scary to think we’re all drinking bits of plastic!). We’ve brought you news of several studies that show to-go cups shed microplastics, and many focus on how heat and hot liquids break down the lining of to-go cups.

Well, let’s keep piling on. Researchers in Australia came to the same conclusion, but took it a step further. Their study, published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials: Plastics, found that higher temperatures “sharply increases” the release of microplastics from several types of plastic.

In an article for The Conversation, study co-author Xiangyu Liu noted two important trends. First, the type of cup matters. “The paper cups with plastic linings released fewer microplastics than the all-plastic cups,” Liu wrote. Secondly, heat plays a big role in how microplastics shed: “For the all-plastic cups, switching from cold to hot water increased the microplastic release by about 33%.”

What we still don’t know is whether microplastics are harmful. Over the years, studies have found microplastics in human brains, blood, and many other areas of the body. However, as Damian Carrington recently reported for The Guardian, some researchers have raised doubts over the methodology and results of several high-profile studies that found microplastics in the body.

One concern critics have is that, because microplastics are so small, even the latest state-of-the-art equipment can’t properly measure them. Additionally, some researchers questioned the methodologies and analytical approaches of the studies.

“This is really forcing us to re-evaluate everything we think we know about microplastics in the body,” said chemist Roger Kuhlman. “Which, it turns out, is really not very much. Many researchers are making extraordinary claims, but not providing even ordinary evidence.”

Photo by Layne Harris on Unsplash

Share This Article
Avatar photo

Fionn Pooler

Fionn Pooler is a coffee roaster and freelance writer currently based in the Scottish Highlands who has worked in the specialty coffee industry for over a decade. Since 2016 he has written the Pourover, a newsletter and blog that uses interviews and critical analysis to explore coffee’s place in the wider, changing world (and also yell at corporations).

Join 12,500+ coffee leaders and get top stories, deals, and other industry goodies in your inbox each week.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


Other Articles You May Like

Compass Coffee Co-Founders Settle Lawsuit Over Fraud Allegations

The messy legal feud for the now-bankrupt brand has ended.
by Fionn Pooler | October 22, 2026

Genetic Analysis Shows Some Gesha Coffees Aren’t Actually Gesha

New research from Ecuador suggests genetic labels aren’t always accurate.
by Fionn Pooler | October 20, 2026

Starbucks Sued Over “Sugar-Free” Label on Eight Protein Drinks

Can drinks that feature dairy milk be labeled as “sugar free?”
by Fionn Pooler | October 15, 2026

Researchers Find Kopi Luwak-Like Fermentation Can Raise Liberica Coffee’s Score Ten Points

Bacteria often used in food fermentation, and in the digestive tracts of civet cats, have been found to have a dramatic impact on Liberica coffee’s flavor.
by Fionn Pooler | October 13, 2026